A Brief Rant on Patience

Are some forms of patience more reasonable than others?

Deacon Rodda
images of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others from the 1963 civil rights protests
images of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others from the 1963 civil rights protests
images of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others from the 1963 civil rights protests
images of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others from the 1963 civil rights protests
images of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others from the 1963 civil rights protests
images of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others from the 1963 civil rights protests
images of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others from the 1963 civil rights protests
images of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others from the 1963 civil rights protests
images of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and others from the 1963 civil rights protests

I strongly recommend reading anything by Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. PhD. In his book, Why We Can’t Wait, King offers cold, unflorished facts paired with first hand accounts of the plight of the American Negro. This account of the situation is presented along with shrewd socio-economic analysis and high praise for the strategy of nonviolent resistance, introduced to King by Bayard Rustin. King, as some of you may know, was a well-armed advocate of violent community defense before that communist weirdo, Rustin, came into his life. I digress.

Here’s something that I wrestle with: I do a lot of different things. All of them are related, and I see them all as necessary to each other. Sometimes, I get frustrated with how long something is taking — or how long everything is taking. I want to be further along in the process. On good days, I want to do the reading. When I’m at my worst I just want to have done the reading already. Substitute ‘doing the reading’ for whatever you want. When I want to have done the thing instead of wanting to do the thing, I find myself suffering.

Here’s the weird part. The suffering, for me, mostly persists when I’m not procrastinating. When I am working full tilt on a client project and I just want it to be finished, I suffer more than when I take a break and walk away from it. When I am annotating Adam Smith, thinking about what I can expound on and what I can pick apart, I am more anxious than when I am just reading and trying to really understand.

I also recommend listening to at least one of Gary Vaynerchuck’s lectures and Q&A sessions.

“Whoa, Deacon. Too far. Where’s this going?”

It might be bonkers to juxtapose MLK and Gary Vee but bear with me here. Vaynerchuck has this saying, “Marco patience; micro speed.” What’s that mean? Well, the way my buddy Matt explains it, “Do what you know you ought to do today and tomorrow will worry about itself.”

In describing the frenetic wind of the uprisings in Birmingham and throughout the U.S. in 1963, King notes that many Black folk became joyful in offering themselves up for arrest, packing the jails, and enduring pain at the hands of the state.

Why? Why would Black folk experience liberation in the very act of being put into very real bondage and injury by folks who actively despised them, whose acts of hatred were mediated by very little oversight or consequence?

And, if Black folk can find joy in suffering, then is there any real necessity to stop waiting? If the end of suffering comes from mere acceptance and participation in reality as it is, what’s the hurry? Wouldn’t it be better to wait a little while than to just offer one’s self up as a martyr at the first opportunity, for the sake of the joy and liberation of acceptance?

Well, It depends on what we mean by waiting. Macro patience; micro speed. Sometimes, people wait for the right opportunity to come along, for the government to soften to their cries, for someone or something else to change. That’s one kind of waiting. And, I believe that King is petitioning us to stop doing that. There is a different kind of waiting. There is the waiting one does for a seed to sprout. In a way, it isn’t waiting at all. It is planting — and understanding how seeds work. The one who plants doesn’t bother composing arguments that plants ought to be growing here or there. They don’t form ideals about how circumstances ought to be. They keep moving, knowing the joy of right action, and trusting that the results will take care of themselves.

Did you find a new angle on some old thoughts?

And, are you someone who dedicates any amount of your precious time and resources to improving your community, to developing new economic models, or to regenerating ecosystems?

Move from strained to strategized with a little drip of tips and tales sent to your inbox — not annoyingly often.

Get on the SQGLZ newsletter list to get in on the conversation. I respond to every reply.

Mash that button.

cheers.

Submitting Responses

If you’d like to respond to this article, anonymously or otherwise, you may do so using the form at the bottom of this section. Know that your response will be published if it meets the following guidelines:

What is Encouraged

  • Love — Everyone has something to offer and every perspective is an irreplaceable gift.
  • Rigor — Remember that intellectual rigor is simply the discipline of not being wrong by neglect. Proof reading your comments is encouraged.
  • Wit — Points for helping others to want to read what you have to say.

What is Allowed

  • Disagreement — With the author or anyone else in the comments.
  • Profanity — As long as you have something relevant to say, say it however you like.
  • Stupidity — Just putting this out there for everyone who is going to say, “Why did you allow that comment?”

What is Forbidden

  • no ad hominem
    For simplicity, this ad hominem rule includes all ontological claims about interlocutors. To make it easy, just don’t say that anyone else is anything and you’re good. There’s simply no intellectual reason that such claims are ever necessary or productive in a discourse.
  • no solicitation of crime
    To be clear, you may advocate for crime. E.g. “You should be beaten.” and “We should get together and start a riot.” are not permitted comments. But, “Certain things now considered assault in many states are perfectly morally reasonable.” and “The BLM riot in Minneapolis was justified.” are perfectly permissible comments.
  • no off-topic responses
    All comments must relate directly to the article and to themselves. This means that the entire comment must be composed of ideas which interrelate with the article, each other, or both. And, you can always reach out about other stuff through the contact page.

If any part of a comment violates one of the above rules, it will not be edited. It simply won’t appear. If your comment does not get posted, you are more than welcome to reach out to me through the form on the Contact page, but that would forfeit your anonymity. Your call.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
#designsovereignty

Some More Articles

’cause hell, you made it all the way down here.

Deacon Rodda
July 14, 2024

To Burn a Church

Nostalgia may indeed be a pathology. But things do really change. And while we tend to grow sentimental even about the miserable abuses we hated in the moment — for all the character they built in us, and the trauma bonds they left us with — sometimes we are actually recalling truly good personal and cultural institutions lost to the past. Sometimes we just ruin good things. Here in Denver, we used to have nice things that we don’t have anymore. One of those things was a cultural and socio-political lynchpin that no one really seems to grasp the implications of letting go.
Deacon Rodda
February 9, 2024

kickstarter post mortem

I ran a “failed” Kickstarter campaign for a book of practical philosophy. This article traces the threads of that project from its origins a quarter century ago to its possible future successful publication — with lessons learned which stand to benefit both society and li’l ol’ me.
Deacon Rodda
March 15, 2022

Data on Authority

Authority gets a bad rap. It’s reasonable that we should have very high standards for people in positions of authority, so it stands to reason that we’ll be disappointed frequently. But Data, of Star Trek fame, really shows us how it’s done.